I can’t come anywhere close to covering all the points in favor of social dance, or refuting the many arguments against it– but I’ve given a shot at some of them today. I know most of our readers and most of the editors share my opinions on this (as I have danced with many of them) but I’d like to hear what you think of how I come to my conclusions.
In 1848, in his book ‘A Fable for Critics’: the poet James Russell Lowell published these sarcastic words:
He who esteems the Virginia reel
A bait to draw saints from their spiritual weal,
And regards the quadrille as a far greater knavery
Than crushing His African children with slavery,
Since all who take part in a waltz or cotillon
Are mounted for hell on the devil’s own pillion,
Who, as every true orthodox Christian well knows,
Approaches the heart through the door of the toes.
While Lowell was not being sincere, many Christians have taken this stance with all sincerity. Dancing has been called vile, dangerous, “unfriendly to Christian life and growth”ยน and just plain old uncouth.
And yet, despite all the fiery sermons that have been preached, the question persists. Is dancing (particularly social dancing) an activity that is lawful for Christians?
I believe the answer is a firm and resounding ‘Yes’. Christians can and should dance. But what is the biblical basis for this position? How can this view be defended against all of the arguments that have been raised against it? (Please note that I will not be discussing the merits of liturgical dance. That’s an issue for another day).
When I first considered the morality of social dancing, I went straight to the family copy of Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance and copied down all the verses that mentioned dancing. Experienced scholars will most certainly tell you that this is not the way to go about studying an issue, but it was informative. In the King James Version of the Bible, dancing is referenced around 20 times. Almost all of these instances refer to dancing in worship, and almost all of this dancing is done alone, or by one sex alone.
So how does this relate to social dancing? It’s difficult to say. There are no descriptions of the dances of the saints, and there are few significant references to dancing outside of worship.
Jeremiah 31:3 says, “Then shall the virgin rejoice in the dance, both young men and old together: for I will turn their mourning into joy, and will comfort them, and make them rejoice from their sorrow.” The contrast is between rejoicing, including dancing; and mourning (not including dancing). We see this again in Psalm 30:11, “Thou hast turned for me my mourning into dancing: thou hast put off my sackcloth, and girded me with gladness;” and again in the parable in Luke 15:25, “Now his elder son was in the field: and as he came and drew nigh to the house, he heard music and dancing.”
We see the parallel to this in Lamentations 5:15: “The joy of our heart is ceased; our dance is turned into mourning.”
The obvious conclusion one has to draw is that dancing is a sign of joy. It marks the end of mourning, and is done in celebration. The example from Luke is particularly telling: Jesus didn’t stop in the middle of the parable to point out the opprobrious wickedness of the prodigal’s family in allowing dancing to occur at their party! When Jesus told us a story about celebration, he included music and dancing. I think He did this intentionally, as He did everything.
I don’t think it’s a stretch to say that it was obvious to Jesus that people make music and dance to celebrate things. And nor did He consider it worth reviling. And neither should we.
But the question still hangs– should men and women dance together? From what I understand of Jewish culture, men and women did not dance together. But there were plenty of other divisions of the sexes that Christians do not and should not observe today. To argue that men and women should not dance together because the Jewish people didn’t would place you in the awkward position of also arguing that men and women should not sit together in church.
“The Israelites didn’t do it this way” is not a good argument. If the Israelites didn’t do it because God forbade it, that is a good reason. But you won’t find a command forbidding social dancing in the Bible; not between Genesis and Malachi, and not between Matthew and Revelation. Social dancing is never explicitly forbidden in the Bible.
But can we do something just because it’s never forbidden? Should we do something not forbidden, but not commanded? Well, yes. There are many things that are good and lawful, though not commanded. Things like serving birthday cake, or planting a flower garden, or reading devotional books are things that are never commanded, but are certainly permissible, even good for Christians to do. And how do we know these things are good? Because they mirror the commands of scripture. They build up brothers in Christ. They encourage us to offer praise to our Creator for His good gifts. They cause us to further deepen our relationship with our Head.
I will be bold and say that the same is true for social dance. It builds community between Christians, it inspires thankfulness, and it gives us a microcosm of Christian living.
When dancing with a woman, a man must lead– and he must lead well. If the dancing is to be done correctly, the man cannot passively allow or force the woman to control the dance, and he cannot roughly drag her around the floor. The excellent male dancer honors his partner in body and in will: He shows that she is glorious.
The woman’s duty is to follow– not limply and lamely, but with spirit and direction, responding to her partner’s lead. She is to trust and cooperate, and not blindly, but as a decision maker. The man can raise his hand as much as he wants, but the woman has the final say in when to twirl.
In many forms of social dance, particularly American folk dancing and contra dancing, each pair of dancers interacts with all of the other pairs of dancers on the floor. They are not separated as a single couple, but are always interacting as part of a larger group, and are always working in community.
There are many other aspects of social dancing that are pictures of the life we are called to live, such as the men protecting the women from the ‘dangers’ of the dance floor (there’s a reason dances are arranged the way they are: if anyone runs into anyone, most dances allow for this to be the men), the unity the music provides, and the dedication and service required for dancing to be facilitated.
But the most remarkable thing about dancing, particularly social dancing, is summed up well in a quote that has been attributed to St. Augustine of Hippo:
I praise the dance, for it frees people
from the heaviness of matter and binds
the isolated to community.
I praise the dance, which demands everything:
health and a clear spirit and a buoyant soul.
Dance is a transformation of space, of time, of people,
who are in constant danger of becoming all brain,
will, or feeling.
Dancing demands a whole person, one who is
firmly anchored in the center of his life, who is
not obsessed by lust for people and things
and the demon of isolation in his own ego.
Dancing demands a freed person, one who vibrates
with the equipoise of all his powers.
I praise the dance.
O man, learn to dance, or else the angels in heaven
will not know what to do with you.
1. Dancing as a Christian Amusement by George C. Heckman, President of Hanover College,Philadelphia: Presbyterian Board of Publication, 1879
|
Posted at 11:24 pm EST on the 21st of August 2009 by H. G. Roorda. Under Essays as Augustine, Christian Community, Christian worldview, Dance, James Russell Lowell, Quotes There are 8 replies. |
![]() |
Very nicely done! What a well-thought out post. :D I of course agree, and I especially like the paragraph about dancing being a “microcosm of Christian living.”
I have always liked the image of leading and following that dancing provides. You have put it to words very nicely.
Very nicely done.
(Heehee, I haunt this site)
I love this essay. It is really well written. I think dancing is another subject that should be added to the “Adiaphora” list.
I especially like how you wrote out the “A man must lead – A woman’s duty is to follow”. I taught a guy to dance last month, and I attempted to explain that to him, but I did a poor job and it ended very awkwardly. I wish I had your explanation at hand. :)
Well, very good. Although – correct me if I’m wrong – you didn’t really cover the issue of romanticization of social dance, summed up quite well in this quote – “Or perchance, when the last little star has left the sky, shall we still be together with our arms around eachother, and shall you be my new romance? On the clear understanding that this kind of thing can happen, shall we dance, shall we dance, shall we dance?” I mean, admit it, if I asked a girl to dance like that, she’d be unjust not to slap me in the face. How do we know social dance won’t descend into that sort of chaos?
I really like it, Hannah!
One interesting thing about social dancing is that (to do it the way that I think it should be done) it makes the man be masculine and the woman be feminine. It kind of counters what our modern culture likes to say about how women can do what men can do… and it demasculinizes men. So. That’s just a thought.
I think one reason to dance (though it depends in what way) is because it is a way of showing thankfulness, wouldn’t you say? When you’re happy you go around excitedly and such. So, it would seem healthy to go off dancing when you’re thankful, and in that way dancing is justified. But it does matter in what way. If you were in a small, struggling community, after each harvest, you might have a big feast and dance together as a community.
Sorry that my thoughts are scraggly and redundant.
Lauren, thank you. The microcosm aspect is one of the reasons I love dance!
Luke, thanks so much! You and your brothers have taught us more about leading and following than an essay ever could.
Lyss– glad you liked it, and thanks! Teaching guys to dance is very, very difficult… sometimes I ask them to try following so they can see how to lead.
John– Good point. I intend to cover that in a follow-up post.
Ami, you make perfect sense to me. Thanks for the insight!
What about when Herod’s daughter danced?
Is that not social dancing?
I would definitely say it was not a good thing. ^_^
Erin, no, it wasn’t social dancing. Here are some definitions “Social dance is a major category or classification of danceforms or dance styles, where sociability and socializing are the primary focuses of the dancing.” (wikipedia) “Dance that is primarily performed for the enjoyment of participants” (this one I found simply by typing “define: social dance in Google”). These seem to be pretty concise definitions of what we mean by social dance. Quite clearly Herod’s daughter was not engaging in social dance, but some other form of dance. (performance centered evidently, but if the text suggested she was polkaing with King Herod or a bunch of people were doing the Electric Slide or something, I am quite willing to reconsider my opinion) I don’t think Hannah is defended every kind of dancing; in fact, I’m sure we all know she is not.
In short, social dancing is not performance oriented. As Jane Austen would say, “Fine dancing, like virtue, must be its own reward.”